Friday, December 17, 2010

Saint Louis County about to waste $2 million of their $7.6 mil of a stimulus grant on smoking ban ads, plus four April 2011 ban referendums

As if Saint Louis County voters need any reminders that selfish smoking bans that only deprive privately owned businesses of their property rights are needed in both Saint Louis city and Saint Louis County from January 2nd and onward. I will not be surprised if many of the businesses that are covered by either the city or county ban after January 2nd quietly plan to thumb their nose at the law in some way, since both bans have crappy exemptions(Saint Louis city is worse, since it only exempts bars that have a floor space of 2000 sq. ft. or less, excluding kitchen areas), and that both should've had exemptions for businesses that are 18 and up at all times, and didn't allow minors inside at any time.

It's already looking like 4 Missouri communities, minimum(though not all confirmed yet), will have smoking bans on the April 5th ballot(Webb City, Cape Girardeau, O'Fallon, and Springfield). Only the first 3 have been confirmed to have enough signatures, and in Springfield, they still have to verify the signatures first. Joplin may or may not have a ban on the ballot in April, but I wouldn't be surprised if the Joplin antis collect the signatures in time before the April election.

I'd love it if all 4 communities could send a strong signal to state lawmakers that they do NOT want Missouri to enact an unnecessary, job-killing smoking ban in 2011. It's too bad those in Fulton who opposed a ban barely came up short in the final vote last month, since I recall it only passed by 6 percentage points there.

QUICK EDIT: Joplin's ban didn't go on the ballot, and Springfield, MO's ban will be going on the ballot in April. So that makes 4 smoking bans overall, which are as I said above, Webb City, Springfield, O'Fallon, and Cape Girardeau). I still will make a post on the November 2010 smoking ban referendums very soon, plus an Alaska community's smoking ban referendum defeat in late 2010 on a total ban I only heard about several months late.

http://www.stltoday.com/news/local/metro/article_accf5ec9-8c19-592a-acd1-ae0a853c9059.html

http://www.joplinglobe.com/local/x797276092/Webb-City-smoking-ban-heads-to-voters (Webb City)

http://www.semissourian.com/story/1688154.html (Cape Girardeau, and btw, I think the newly-formed coalition fighting this ban should just shorten their name to Stand Up Cape, or Speak Out Cape, similar to the past groups Speak Out Amarillo and Speak Out San Angelo)

http://www.stltoday.com/news/local/stcharles/article_2b4ae648-06eb-11e0-8b17-0017a4a78c22.html (O'Fallon, MO, which is in Saint Charles County, MO and not covered by the Saint Louis County ban)

http://www.ky3.com/news/ky3-story-smoking-ban-springfield-businesses-petition-12162010,0,5731564.story (Springfield, MO)

and I'd like to have some opinions on what I should do in 2011

with the poll section. I'm considering extending the length of how long I keep the poll open to 2 months, from the existing 1 month. Please vote now, on what your preference should be(whether I should keep the length of each poll at 1 month and not change it, or if you like this idea). Thanks to everyone who reads this blog, and sorry for how much I've stunk updating this since October. I hope to be totally caught up and be very active again with posts here, before the start of 2011.

Regular polls should return by February, knock on wood. I just want to see how much regular readers here like this idea, before I decide on either proceeding or not proceeding with this idea. I might do some other minor changes too, such as(once I settle on something that isn't bad!) changing the look of this blog from the current black/white look.

-Allan

new surgeon general's report called 'unscientific and potentially unethical'

I'm going to make another try to stay active with this blog, hopefully this time, I am able to stick with keeping it active, unlike my past failed attempts. Enjoy this new article:

http://www.cnsnews.com/news/article/surgeon-general-s-report-tobacco-called

And Dr. Michael Siegal has also quickly blasted the new report as well:
http://tobaccoanalysis.blogspot.com/2010/12/surgeon-generals-office-again.html